Reading and Writing Workshop
Criminal Law and Procedure
Essential Questions:
Session 1: Origins of Criminal Law and Case Law Traditions
Focus: Sources of Law—Statutes, Common Law, and Case Law
Reading:
Session 2: Crime and Punishment in American Law
Focus: Distinguishing Felonies and Misdemeanors
Reading:
Session 3: Famous Defenses in Criminal Trials
Focus: Criminal Defenses—Insanity, Self-Defense, Duress, etc.
Reading:
Session 4: The Constitution and the Rights of the Accused
Focus: 4th and 5th Amendments—Search and Seizure, Self-Incrimination, Due Process
Reading:
Session 5: The Rule of Law in Action
Focus: Enforcement and Challenges of the Law
Reading:
Optional Reading Enrichment (Advanced Students)
Text:
Workshop Assessment Options
Essential Questions:
- What distinguishes criminal law from other forms of law?
- How are laws made, enforced, and challenged?
Session 1: Origins of Criminal Law and Case Law Traditions
Focus: Sources of Law—Statutes, Common Law, and Case Law
Reading:
- Commentaries on the Laws of England by Sir William Blackstone (Vol. 4: Of Public Wrongs)
Full text: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/8082
- Read selected sections on public wrongs (criminal offenses) and discuss how common law shaped U.S. criminal law.
- Annotate a passage to identify key legal principles still relevant today.
- Write a one-page response comparing how criminal wrongs were defined in Blackstone’s time versus now.
Session 2: Crime and Punishment in American Law
Focus: Distinguishing Felonies and Misdemeanors
Reading:
- Crime and Criminals (1901) by Jessie Annie Anderson
Full text: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/72399
- Students read excerpts describing crimes from early 20th-century perspectives.
- Discuss what has changed in criminal classification and punishment over time.
- Choose one described crime and rewrite it as a modern statute with classification (felony/misdemeanor), punishment, and rationale.
Session 3: Famous Defenses in Criminal Trials
Focus: Criminal Defenses—Insanity, Self-Defense, Duress, etc.
Reading:
- Trial of Daniel McFarland for the Murder of Albert D. Richardson (1870)
Full text: https://archive.org/details/trialofdanielmcf00mcfa
- Read selections from the trial record and identify the defense used (temporary insanity).
- In small groups, analyze the persuasive strategies used by the defense.
- Write a courtroom-style closing argument for or against McFarland, using legal language and referencing one accepted defense.
Session 4: The Constitution and the Rights of the Accused
Focus: 4th and 5th Amendments—Search and Seizure, Self-Incrimination, Due Process
Reading:
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
Full text: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/436/
- Students read the syllabus and majority opinion (selected excerpts).
- Use a constitutional chart to identify each right explained and the legal reasoning behind the decision.
- Write a reflection essay: Should the Miranda warning still be required today? Why or why not?
Session 5: The Rule of Law in Action
Focus: Enforcement and Challenges of the Law
Reading:
- The Federalist Papers No. 78 by Alexander Hamilton (on the role of the judiciary)
Full text: https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/text-71-80
- Students close read No. 78 to identify Hamilton’s argument for judicial independence and how it relates to criminal procedure.
- Discuss the checks on law enforcement powers.
- Write a letter to a legislator arguing for or against a proposed change to criminal procedure (e.g., limits on search technology, body camera mandates), citing historical context and constitutional protections.
Optional Reading Enrichment (Advanced Students)
Text:
- An Essay on Crimes and Punishments by Cesare Beccaria (1764)
Full text: https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/beccaria-an-essay-on-crimes-and-punishments
- Compare Enlightenment theories on punishment to modern justice reform.
- Host a seminar-style discussion on Beccaria’s opposition to the death penalty and torture.
Workshop Assessment Options
- Legal reflection journal (one entry per session)
- Final persuasive essay: “How should we balance public safety and individual rights in criminal procedure?”
- Public speaking task: Simulate a courtroom argument based on one of the readings