CONTENT FOR EDUCATORS AND MORE
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Terms of Use
Picture
The Things They Carried

Culminating Project Ideas
Reading and Writing Workshop:  The Things They Carried by Ti O'Brian is a collection of linked short stories that explore the experiences of soldiers in Vietnam.  The book delves into themes of war, memory and storytelling, reflecting the emotional and psychological burdens faced by the characters.  
Workshop Overview
This workshop uses small group reading, rotating roles, and sustained analytical and reflective writing to examine history and trauma.  War is experienced individually but produced collectively through policy, culture, and storytelling.

Standing Group Roles (Rotate Each Session)
  1. Discussion Leader – facilitates group talk
  2. Evidence Curator – tracks quotations with page numbers
  3. History Connector – applies the historical source to the chapter
  4. Craft Analyst – analyzes structure, repetition, imagery
  5. Ethics Chair – raises moral and psychological questions


SESSION 1
Objects, the Draft, and the Weight of Policy
Reading (Exact)
  • “The Things They Carried”

Embedded Historical Context
Why these men are there:
Most soldiers in O’Brien’s platoon did not choose war freely. Many were drafted during a period when the U.S. dramatically expanded troop deployment.
Primary Source
  • Selective Service System – Vietnam Draft & Lotteries
    https://www.sss.gov/history-and-records/vietnam-lotteries/
Key idea to emphasize:
  • Random selection turns policy into personal fate

Group Activity
Carry Inventory with History Layer
Groups chart:
  1. Physical objects
  2. Emotional burdens
  3. How the draft made these burdens unavoidable
Discussion
  • How does government policy become weight on the body?
  • Which burdens come from war—and which come from fear of judgment?
Writing
Personal Inventory Paragraph
Prompt: The things I carry because others expect me to.
SESSION 2
Escalation, Authority, and Obedience
Reading
  • “Spin”
  • “On the Rainy River”

Embedded Historical Context
Why escape felt impossible:
In 1964, Congress passed a resolution that dramatically expanded presidential power to wage war without a formal declaration.
Primary Source
  • Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (1964)
    https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/tonkin-gulf-resolution
Key idea:
  • Authority flows downward; consequences do not.
Group Activity
Authority Chain Map
Congress → President → Military → Soldier
Groups annotate:
  • Who decides?
  • Who suffers?
Discussion
  • Is O’Brien running from war—or from judgment?
  • How does shame function as social control?
Writing
Analytical Paragraph
How does political authority translate into personal moral crisis?


SESSION 3
Story-Truth vs. Official Truth
Reading (Exact)
  • “How to Tell a True War Story”
Embedded Historical Context
How the war was explained to the public:
Presidential rhetoric emphasized peace, necessity, and moral clarity—even as the war grew more destructive.
Primary Source
  • Lyndon B. Johnson, “Peace Without Conquest” (1965)
    https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-johns-hopkins-university-peace-without-conquest
Group Activity
Truth Comparison Chart
  • Government language
  • O’Brien’s storytelling
  • Soldier experience
Discussion
  • Why does O’Brien distrust “lessons”?
  • Whose version of truth feels more honest—and why?
Writing
Dual Narrative
Tell the same event twice:
  1. As an official report
  2. As emotional truth
SESSION 4
Fear, Violence, and Breakdown of Trust
Reading (Exact)
  • “Enemies”
  • “Friends”
Embedded Historical Context
Why fear dominated the battlefield:
The Vietnam War lacked clear front lines, increasing paranoia, internal violence, and mistrust.
Primary Source
  • National Archives: Vietnam War overview
    https://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam-war
Group Activity
Trust Breakdown Chart
Track how fear:
  • isolates soldiers
  • turns them against each other

Discussion
  • How does fear distort morality?
  • What replaces trust when survival dominates?
Writing
Short Analysis
How fear reshapes relationships more powerfully than ideology.
SESSION 5
Love, Transformation, and the Seduction of War
Reading 
  • “Love”
  • “Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong”
Embedded Historical Context
War as a totalizing force:
Vietnam blurred civilian and military boundaries, pulling even noncombatants into its logic.
Primary Source
  • U.S. Army Vietnam-era materials (LOC collection)
    https://www.loc.gov/collections/vietnam-war-maps/about-this-collection/
Group Activity
Transformation Timeline
Mary Anne before → during → after Vietnam
Discussion
  • Is Mary Anne liberated—or consumed?
  • What does war reward?
Writing
Symbol Analysis
Analyze one image that represents identity loss.
SESSION 6
Killing, Guilt, and Moral Injury
Reading
  • “The Man I Killed”
  • “Ambush”
Embedded Historical Context
Civilian death and moral collapse:
The Vietnam War forced Americans to confront civilian casualties and moral responsibility.
Primary Source
  • My Lai Report (Peers Report)
    https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llmlp/MyLaiReport/MyLaiReport.pdf
Group Activity
Known vs. Imagined Chart
What O’Brien knows, imagines, projects.
Discussion
  • Why does O’Brien obsess over details?
  • What does guilt do to memory?
Writing
Close Reading Paragraph
How silence conveys trauma.

SESSION 7
Trauma, Silence, and Coming Home
Reading
  • “Speaking of Courage”
  • “Notes”
Embedded Historical Context
Veterans and silence:
Many Vietnam veterans returned to a divided country that did not know how to listen.
Primary Source
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs – Vietnam Veterans
    https://www.va.gov/opa/publications/factsheets/fs_vietnam_veterans.pdf
Group Activity
Silence Audit
Who cannot speak—and why?
Discussion
  • What happens when stories have no audience?
  • Is silence protective or destructive?
Writing
Structure Analysis
How circular narration mirrors PTSD.
SESSION 8
Vietnamization, Persuasion, and Trust
Reading (Exact)
  • “Good Form”
Embedded Historical Context
Government attempts to regain trust:
As opposition grew, leaders reframed the war as controlled and winding down.
Primary Source
  • Nixon, “Silent Majority” Speech (1969)
    https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/richardnixonsilentmajority.htm
Group Activity
Persuasion Comparison
Government rhetoric vs. O’Brien’s confession
Discussion
  • Who deserves the audience’s trust?
  • Is emotional honesty a form of persuasion?
Writing
Argument Paragraph
Is emotional truth more ethical than factual certainty?
SESSION 9
Endings That Don’t End
Reading
  • “Field Trip”
  • “The Lives of the Dead”

Embedded Historical Context
How wars “end” on paper:
Official withdrawal did not mean emotional closure.
Primary Sources
  • Paris Peace Accords (1973)
    https://docsteach.org/document/paris-peace-accords/
  • War Powers Resolution (1973)
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-87/pdf/STATUTE-87-Pg555.pdf

Group Activity
Policy Ending vs. Personal Ending Chart
Discussion
  • Why does O’Brien end with childhood?
  • Do stories preserve life?
Writing
Reflective Analysis
Why memory, not victory, is the book’s conclusion.
SESSION 10
Synthesis Seminar & Writing Launch
Reading
  • Whole-text review
Seminar Prompts
  • Is truth something that happens—or something we tell?
  • What do we still carry after war ends?
  • Who gets to tell the story of a war?
Culminating Writing Options
  • Literary Analysis
  • Rhetorical Analysis
  • Hybrid Narrative–Argument
Requirement:
Use at least one Vietnam War primary source to deepen literary analysis.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Terms of Use